Wednesday, April 05, 2006
Has Apple lost its mind? Well, maybe not.
Let me see if I have this straight. By far, the biggest potential problem with Apple moving the Mac to Intel-based processors is the fact that some geek moron would figure out how to run Windows natively on a Mac and then publish a step by step process on how to do it, thus effectively allowing users to turn their Intel-based Mac into just another useless Windows box, and rendering the Mac platform nonexistent. But instead of finding an innovative way to keep this from happening and averting doom, Apple has instead released a software patch that allows you just go ahead and install Windows without batting an eyelash. Has Apple gone certifiably insane? Is it time to lock up Steve and the gang in a rubber room for their own safety and protection? Is doomsday upon us?
Well, maybe not.
It's tough to look at this one objectively, because I find the idea of this "BootCamp" software incredibly distasteful. So much so that the thought of it makes me literally want to vomit. And I know that most of you are having the same reaction. That's because it is distasteful. It's disgusting. If you don't find this offensive as a Mac user, then I don't want to know you. Starting soon, some people who "switch" to the Mac are going to continue using Windows, and I'm not talking about occasionally firing it up for this or that oddball software title. I'm talking about using Windows full-time, as if MacOS X weren't even installed, as if it didn't even exist. After installing Windows within minutes of first firing up their new Mac, some of them will never get around to going back to MacOS X for anything. Some of the stupider ones will even believe that they are in fact "using a Mac" by using Windows on Mac hardware, just because they bought the computer from Apple, mistakenly believing that Macs are Windows-based just like all the crappy computers on the market that they're used to.
Much as I'd like to think that there can't possibly be anyone on that planet that stupid, I'm reminded of the fact that some of the smartest people I know suddenly become some of the stupidest people I know, the minute the topic of computers enters the conversation. These people don't know the difference between Mac and Windows, they've managed to confuse themselves out of ever being able to understand the difference, and no amount of explanation will ever cure them of that. They're not going to buy a Mac because they already know that it's "not Windows." Except now they are going to buy a Mac, because they can continue to use Windows.
I find the whole thing patently offensive. And yet I have to applaud Apple for having the guts to do it.
I'm reminded of the landscape back in mid-2002, when Apple had to make the decision whether or not to officially make the iPod available to Windows users. At the time I didn't favor the idea because I was concerned that if Windows users no longer had to buy a Mac in order to get their hands on an iPod, it would be a disincentive for them to switch to the Mac. In fact, at the time I foresaw a number of problems in opening up the iPod to the Windows universe. I feared FireWire would eventually be pushed by the wayside in favor of the inferior USB 2.0. I worried that people would install iTunes on their poorly functioning Windows boxes and then improperly blame Apple when iTunes couldn't perform any better in that bed of quicksand than any of the rest of their installed applications.
Just about everything I predicted that would go wrong ended up coming true. But what I didn't see at the time was that none of them would add up to be enough of a collective minus to cancel out the net positive gained by putting the iPod into the hands of millions of Windows users. In hindsight, it was a messy decision, one that cost us Mac users some things, but one that on the whole worked out really well for the Mac platform. Unless you think that the Mac's resulting 35 to 40 percent year over year unit growth is a bad thing.
And the kicker is that most CEO's would be perfectly willing to sit back and let the Mac grow at that impressive rate for awhile, seeing as how it's three times that of the rest of the computing industry. The Mac is in fact gaining marketshare, after all. But with today's move, it's clear that Steve Jobs is not willing to just sit back and collect new users one at a time in a clean and sterile environment. He wants them all, and he doesn't care how he gets them or just how messy it might get. Talk about aggressive.
Let's be clear here that there are two different potential types of Windows users who will be more inclined to buy a Mac when they find out that they can easily run Windows on it. There's the group of people who have been wanting to switch for awhile, but their workflow depends on one specific piece of specialized or otherwise obscure software that can only run on Windows. When they find out that they can run that one piece of software through Windows on a Mac at full speed, they'll go ahead and pull the trigger. But we know that this is a very small group of people, as there are just so few mainstream software titles that aren't available on the Mac. We're talking about a few small niches here, and to those folks I say hey, you know what you're doing, welcome to the Mac platform. You want to fire up Windows ten percent of the time, more power to you. I don't care.
But then there's everyone else. Windows users who use Windows because it's all they know, or in many cases because it's all they know of. Literally everything they're doing on Windows could be done at least as easily on a Mac, and their reasons for not considering a Mac boil down to a combination of misconception and fear. Tell these people that they can buy a Mac and keep using Windows, though, and now you've given Linus his proverbial security blanket. Nevermind that not a single one of them will ever have any legitimate reason to ever even think about defacing their Mac by installing Windows on it. They'll move to the Mac just because they know that they've got a safety net in place in case they can't figure out how to use a Mac. After all, most of what's wrong with (Windows-using) computer users is that they're too insecure about their potential inability to figure out how to do anything new.
Clearly Apple is banking on most of these folks feeling more secure in switching, and then once they've brought the Mac home and spent ten minutes with it, completely forgetting that the "revert to Windows" option even existed. This notion is helped in large part by the fact that even those who buy the Mac with the intention of downgrading it to Windows will suddenly realize that they're going to have to buy a retail copy of Windows XP in order to make it happen. And after shelling out for a new computer, turning around and going back to the store to spend another hundred-some bucks on unneeded software is about the last thing most folks want to do.
But man, there are going to be people who are going to insist on doing it anyway, just because they've been brainwashed into believing that you simply can't succeed on a computer unless you're using Windows. They'll misguidedly surf the web within Windows, check their email within Windows, pretty much continue functioning as a computing retard, despite the fact that they're using Mac hardware. Apple is setting itself up for a scenario where after having convinced these people to buy a Mac, Apple will then have to go back and convince those same people to switch to the Mac again by actually using it as a Mac. And despite the plain as day superiority of the interface and applications on the "Mac side" of their Mac, some folks never will be convinced to leave the "Windows side" of their Mac.
In other words, some folks will just be a lost cause. They'll throw away their money on a Mac just so they can run Windows a hundred percent of the time, having gained literally no advantage by having bought the Mac at all, other than having some pretty hardware to look at.
But let's forget about them, as those types are hopeless no matter what they're using. Instead, let's focus on everyone else in the middle, those folks who are trying to have a brain about it all, but they're simply torn between common sense and widely held misconception. They'll buy a Mac and then they'll wonder whether they should go back and buy Windows for it. Or they'll install Windows and then they'll wonder if they should keep using it as a crutch or take the leap to the Mac stuff. And Apple's marketing efforts aside, it's going to have to be people like you and me that help all these new switchers figure out their newly complicated landscape. Just when we thought maybe the world was just going to all quietly switch to the Mac at a nice trickle and we could all just sit back and wait for it to happen, the game's gone and changed, and suddenly we're perhaps more needed than ever.
Because there's going to be a whole lot more Mac users now than any of us could ever have predicted. Despite the fact that having Windows on your Mac in most cases actually makes for a significantly worse experience, the security blanket of having the Windows option there as a fallback is going to push Mac sales through the roof. Nevermind that there's nothing logical about it. None of these people used logic when they made the mistake of choosing Windows in the first place. But now that they know that they have the option of continuing their mistake on a Mac, they're going to come rushing in like nothing we've ever seen. Forget forty percent year over year growth Ð think four hundred percent. Think about a fourth of the people around you using a Mac within four years.
But try not to think about how messy it's going to be. Try to ignore the patently offensive advertisements you'll see on TV in which Apple explains that you can now run Windows natively on your Mac. Try to be gracious when the people around you begin asking idiotic questions about running Windows on a Mac. Just hold your nose to block out the offensive odor of it all, and keep in mind that a lot of these folks are going to be using a Mac, and real soon. And once they go ahead and buy their Mac, start thinking of ways to help convince them to keep it Windows-free.
Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go vomit, and then go buy a whole lot of Apple stock.
Let me see if I have this straight. By far, the biggest potential problem with Apple moving the Mac to Intel-based processors is the fact that some geek moron would figure out how to run Windows natively on a Mac and then publish a step by step process on how to do it, thus effectively allowing users to turn their Intel-based Mac into just another useless Windows box, and rendering the Mac platform nonexistent. But instead of finding an innovative way to keep this from happening and averting doom, Apple has instead released a software patch that allows you just go ahead and install Windows without batting an eyelash. Has Apple gone certifiably insane? Is it time to lock up Steve and the gang in a rubber room for their own safety and protection? Is doomsday upon us?
Well, maybe not.
It's tough to look at this one objectively, because I find the idea of this "BootCamp" software incredibly distasteful. So much so that the thought of it makes me literally want to vomit. And I know that most of you are having the same reaction. That's because it is distasteful. It's disgusting. If you don't find this offensive as a Mac user, then I don't want to know you. Starting soon, some people who "switch" to the Mac are going to continue using Windows, and I'm not talking about occasionally firing it up for this or that oddball software title. I'm talking about using Windows full-time, as if MacOS X weren't even installed, as if it didn't even exist. After installing Windows within minutes of first firing up their new Mac, some of them will never get around to going back to MacOS X for anything. Some of the stupider ones will even believe that they are in fact "using a Mac" by using Windows on Mac hardware, just because they bought the computer from Apple, mistakenly believing that Macs are Windows-based just like all the crappy computers on the market that they're used to.
Much as I'd like to think that there can't possibly be anyone on that planet that stupid, I'm reminded of the fact that some of the smartest people I know suddenly become some of the stupidest people I know, the minute the topic of computers enters the conversation. These people don't know the difference between Mac and Windows, they've managed to confuse themselves out of ever being able to understand the difference, and no amount of explanation will ever cure them of that. They're not going to buy a Mac because they already know that it's "not Windows." Except now they are going to buy a Mac, because they can continue to use Windows.
I find the whole thing patently offensive. And yet I have to applaud Apple for having the guts to do it.
I'm reminded of the landscape back in mid-2002, when Apple had to make the decision whether or not to officially make the iPod available to Windows users. At the time I didn't favor the idea because I was concerned that if Windows users no longer had to buy a Mac in order to get their hands on an iPod, it would be a disincentive for them to switch to the Mac. In fact, at the time I foresaw a number of problems in opening up the iPod to the Windows universe. I feared FireWire would eventually be pushed by the wayside in favor of the inferior USB 2.0. I worried that people would install iTunes on their poorly functioning Windows boxes and then improperly blame Apple when iTunes couldn't perform any better in that bed of quicksand than any of the rest of their installed applications.
Just about everything I predicted that would go wrong ended up coming true. But what I didn't see at the time was that none of them would add up to be enough of a collective minus to cancel out the net positive gained by putting the iPod into the hands of millions of Windows users. In hindsight, it was a messy decision, one that cost us Mac users some things, but one that on the whole worked out really well for the Mac platform. Unless you think that the Mac's resulting 35 to 40 percent year over year unit growth is a bad thing.
And the kicker is that most CEO's would be perfectly willing to sit back and let the Mac grow at that impressive rate for awhile, seeing as how it's three times that of the rest of the computing industry. The Mac is in fact gaining marketshare, after all. But with today's move, it's clear that Steve Jobs is not willing to just sit back and collect new users one at a time in a clean and sterile environment. He wants them all, and he doesn't care how he gets them or just how messy it might get. Talk about aggressive.
Let's be clear here that there are two different potential types of Windows users who will be more inclined to buy a Mac when they find out that they can easily run Windows on it. There's the group of people who have been wanting to switch for awhile, but their workflow depends on one specific piece of specialized or otherwise obscure software that can only run on Windows. When they find out that they can run that one piece of software through Windows on a Mac at full speed, they'll go ahead and pull the trigger. But we know that this is a very small group of people, as there are just so few mainstream software titles that aren't available on the Mac. We're talking about a few small niches here, and to those folks I say hey, you know what you're doing, welcome to the Mac platform. You want to fire up Windows ten percent of the time, more power to you. I don't care.
But then there's everyone else. Windows users who use Windows because it's all they know, or in many cases because it's all they know of. Literally everything they're doing on Windows could be done at least as easily on a Mac, and their reasons for not considering a Mac boil down to a combination of misconception and fear. Tell these people that they can buy a Mac and keep using Windows, though, and now you've given Linus his proverbial security blanket. Nevermind that not a single one of them will ever have any legitimate reason to ever even think about defacing their Mac by installing Windows on it. They'll move to the Mac just because they know that they've got a safety net in place in case they can't figure out how to use a Mac. After all, most of what's wrong with (Windows-using) computer users is that they're too insecure about their potential inability to figure out how to do anything new.
Clearly Apple is banking on most of these folks feeling more secure in switching, and then once they've brought the Mac home and spent ten minutes with it, completely forgetting that the "revert to Windows" option even existed. This notion is helped in large part by the fact that even those who buy the Mac with the intention of downgrading it to Windows will suddenly realize that they're going to have to buy a retail copy of Windows XP in order to make it happen. And after shelling out for a new computer, turning around and going back to the store to spend another hundred-some bucks on unneeded software is about the last thing most folks want to do.
But man, there are going to be people who are going to insist on doing it anyway, just because they've been brainwashed into believing that you simply can't succeed on a computer unless you're using Windows. They'll misguidedly surf the web within Windows, check their email within Windows, pretty much continue functioning as a computing retard, despite the fact that they're using Mac hardware. Apple is setting itself up for a scenario where after having convinced these people to buy a Mac, Apple will then have to go back and convince those same people to switch to the Mac again by actually using it as a Mac. And despite the plain as day superiority of the interface and applications on the "Mac side" of their Mac, some folks never will be convinced to leave the "Windows side" of their Mac.
In other words, some folks will just be a lost cause. They'll throw away their money on a Mac just so they can run Windows a hundred percent of the time, having gained literally no advantage by having bought the Mac at all, other than having some pretty hardware to look at.
But let's forget about them, as those types are hopeless no matter what they're using. Instead, let's focus on everyone else in the middle, those folks who are trying to have a brain about it all, but they're simply torn between common sense and widely held misconception. They'll buy a Mac and then they'll wonder whether they should go back and buy Windows for it. Or they'll install Windows and then they'll wonder if they should keep using it as a crutch or take the leap to the Mac stuff. And Apple's marketing efforts aside, it's going to have to be people like you and me that help all these new switchers figure out their newly complicated landscape. Just when we thought maybe the world was just going to all quietly switch to the Mac at a nice trickle and we could all just sit back and wait for it to happen, the game's gone and changed, and suddenly we're perhaps more needed than ever.
Because there's going to be a whole lot more Mac users now than any of us could ever have predicted. Despite the fact that having Windows on your Mac in most cases actually makes for a significantly worse experience, the security blanket of having the Windows option there as a fallback is going to push Mac sales through the roof. Nevermind that there's nothing logical about it. None of these people used logic when they made the mistake of choosing Windows in the first place. But now that they know that they have the option of continuing their mistake on a Mac, they're going to come rushing in like nothing we've ever seen. Forget forty percent year over year growth Ð think four hundred percent. Think about a fourth of the people around you using a Mac within four years.
But try not to think about how messy it's going to be. Try to ignore the patently offensive advertisements you'll see on TV in which Apple explains that you can now run Windows natively on your Mac. Try to be gracious when the people around you begin asking idiotic questions about running Windows on a Mac. Just hold your nose to block out the offensive odor of it all, and keep in mind that a lot of these folks are going to be using a Mac, and real soon. And once they go ahead and buy their Mac, start thinking of ways to help convince them to keep it Windows-free.
Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go vomit, and then go buy a whole lot of Apple stock.
Comments:
I hate all this boot camp stuff. I can't freaking believe what is happening. I fear the day I glance at someone's MacBook screen only to see them using Windows! I will be physically sick.
I don't even understand how SJ could even tolerate the idea of having a Macintosh defiled with windows filth, much less promote it. What is going on???
I don't even understand how SJ could even tolerate the idea of having a Macintosh defiled with windows filth, much less promote it. What is going on???
Innoculate yourself.
With a Switcher Plan. Be ready to jump in with a plan to demonstrate basic Mac operations when the next big Windows virus hits. Show the Windows users how to set up their email and surf the web no matter what happens on the Windows side of their shiny new Mac.
With a bigger marketshare CNET News.com reports It's also worth noting that the iMac Core Duo with Windows beat a Pentium D 830-based PCs from Dell and Gateway on Photoshop as well. There will be users who will buy a Mac just because of the hardware to run Windows on it. Let them. Apple is a hardware company afterall. (And they do some nifty software too.) A Mac running windows also increases the Mac marketshare numbers and that will be good for all Apple users. Then wait for the next big Virus scare.
With a Switcher Plan. Be ready to jump in with a plan to demonstrate basic Mac operations when the next big Windows virus hits. Show the Windows users how to set up their email and surf the web no matter what happens on the Windows side of their shiny new Mac.
With a bigger marketshare CNET News.com reports It's also worth noting that the iMac Core Duo with Windows beat a Pentium D 830-based PCs from Dell and Gateway on Photoshop as well. There will be users who will buy a Mac just because of the hardware to run Windows on it. Let them. Apple is a hardware company afterall. (And they do some nifty software too.) A Mac running windows also increases the Mac marketshare numbers and that will be good for all Apple users. Then wait for the next big Virus scare.
Ziggybopper has got it right - this is about marketshare. Even if someone buys an iMac for Windows, Apple get the OS revenue as profit and it looks like a MacOSX sale. This trick has been played by M$ for their entire existence - note this article: http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20060405-6531.html.
With enough sales to make it look like MacOSX is increasing rapidly and Apple will have the momentum.
I personally think it is amazing that Apple have trumpted M$ over Vista in April. Leopard allows you to run Windows!
While Apple says Windows is unsupported, expect to see some 3rd party announce support for enterprises.
With enough sales to make it look like MacOSX is increasing rapidly and Apple will have the momentum.
I personally think it is amazing that Apple have trumpted M$ over Vista in April. Leopard allows you to run Windows!
While Apple says Windows is unsupported, expect to see some 3rd party announce support for enterprises.
Make no mistake -- Apple just broke the industry. We have re-entered open warfare between the Mac and the PC, a condition which hasn't existed for over a decade.
According to the Apple site, a Mac with Windows and Boot Camp boots into Mac OS unless you hold down the Option key at boot. So someone intent on running Windows must divert the natural order of their boot process every single time Windows needs to be rebooted. This annoyance alone will get people to try Mac OS; add in the fact that the iSight doesn't work under Windows and most people will switch over time.
Even if a user does insist on Windows, they will know that the Mac is waiting underneath. What will they do when Windows slows to a crawl due to spyware, or doesn't work with their new HP all-in-one because the way Windows handles USB drivers is horribly broken?
The best part is that 90% of Boot Camp installations will use a pirated copy of Windows, so users who plan to buy a Mac and run Windows on it will create a big problem for Microsoft. Remember that the non-upgrade version of XP Home costs $200. The 10% of non-pirated installations will likely be in corporate environments that have an enterprise agreement with Microsoft.
According to the Apple site, a Mac with Windows and Boot Camp boots into Mac OS unless you hold down the Option key at boot. So someone intent on running Windows must divert the natural order of their boot process every single time Windows needs to be rebooted. This annoyance alone will get people to try Mac OS; add in the fact that the iSight doesn't work under Windows and most people will switch over time.
Even if a user does insist on Windows, they will know that the Mac is waiting underneath. What will they do when Windows slows to a crawl due to spyware, or doesn't work with their new HP all-in-one because the way Windows handles USB drivers is horribly broken?
The best part is that 90% of Boot Camp installations will use a pirated copy of Windows, so users who plan to buy a Mac and run Windows on it will create a big problem for Microsoft. Remember that the non-upgrade version of XP Home costs $200. The 10% of non-pirated installations will likely be in corporate environments that have an enterprise agreement with Microsoft.
It's nothing to worry about. We've all seen dozens (or many more) Windows machines that are totally dorked up by spyware, viruses, etc. and the poor home users don't know what to do.
If you ever see this on a Mac running MSwindows, just tell them to fix it by rebooting and holding the option key, instant fix.
If you ever see this on a Mac running MSwindows, just tell them to fix it by rebooting and holding the option key, instant fix.
What I hear is that the OSX side can read and depending on format, also write to the XP side... Therefore these folks will set everything up on the XP side (Linus Blanket) where they are comfortable and experienced and Apple will then reveal that Safari and Mail can automatically configure based on the data on the XP side (but not the reverse). So every time someone attempts to use the OSX side, they discover that all the heavy lifting has already been done... by them and XP! Cool, no?!
Dave from Mtl
Dave from Mtl
As a Mac user the only reason I might like this is Gameing.
But it's been stated here earlier, I can't wait until the Windows user gets slamed with the latest spyware, etc. He switches to the Mac side, and never looks back.
But it's been stated here earlier, I can't wait until the Windows user gets slamed with the latest spyware, etc. He switches to the Mac side, and never looks back.
So Imagine this... a 1st time Mac user gets a iMac, loads XP (faster than he would on a PC), sets it up... mail, browser, ISP stuff, etc... After all, he already knows how to do this. He decides one day to try the Mac side of his new machine due to GarargeBand or something... somewhere in all this Safari is opened and WOW!!!! it is already configured... WHY??? because the MAC OSX side can read everything on the XP side! Auto configure all OSX stuff based on data from XP. Them Apple engineers have a few tricks up their sleeves.
Dave.
Dave.
Relax already. One thing that is not rising to the surface in all of this silly knee jerk commentary is how much this will benefit those in academics whom love OSX but are forced to work in Windows to get some things done. I'm in this crowd, and I hate to say it, but I have come very close to just dumping the Mac entirely because of the slow development time of their laptops before the MBP release and the fact that more and more of my science instrumentation is reliant on Windows. Now it has all changed and I can stay with the OS I really love. Trust me, this is a very good thing.
Here's a scenario: 1st time Mac user buys an iMac... why? cause it looks great and he was always curious about Macs. He of course installs XP and goes through all the configuration stuff... ISP stuff, mail stuff, browser stuff...
The experience is at least as nice as his PC if not better. Then one day he decides he's love to try Garage Band or something like this because he saw it in the Apple advert he gets at home (cause he's an Apple client now!). So he logs into OSX and as he is fiddling around he does something that causes Mail to start.... a pop-up comes before him informing him that Mail can automatically configure based on his XP config (which OSX can do... even write depending on format chosen). A few seconds later his discovers all that time he spent configuring XP was actually to configure OS X as well... Imagine a version of MAIL which receives and sends mail while assuring that the same data is stored in the XP side as well. AutoSynch taken to the next level.
DaveMTL
The experience is at least as nice as his PC if not better. Then one day he decides he's love to try Garage Band or something like this because he saw it in the Apple advert he gets at home (cause he's an Apple client now!). So he logs into OSX and as he is fiddling around he does something that causes Mail to start.... a pop-up comes before him informing him that Mail can automatically configure based on his XP config (which OSX can do... even write depending on format chosen). A few seconds later his discovers all that time he spent configuring XP was actually to configure OS X as well... Imagine a version of MAIL which receives and sends mail while assuring that the same data is stored in the XP side as well. AutoSynch taken to the next level.
DaveMTL
The big wins in this are:
1) Users on the fence who are worried about the initial investment that will be lost if they can get their work done on OS X, now have a safety net.
2) Users who like me have proprietary Windows software they need to run, can now have the machine, OS and Applications they want while being able to run the software they need.
3) Users who want cool Apple hardware with no intention of ever running OS X will have a Zero cost option to learn about OS X.
Bottom line, Apple will sell more computers. With increased volume comes reduced costs so Apple's prices can be even more competitive. Also, with increased volume, comes increased revenue, which translates to increased R&D which translates to a better OS X. Finally increased market share will increase mind-share and visibility which will increase development for the platform.
This is a good thing.
Prediction:
End of 2008: Mac OS X market share 10%, Apple marketshare 13%.
1) Users on the fence who are worried about the initial investment that will be lost if they can get their work done on OS X, now have a safety net.
2) Users who like me have proprietary Windows software they need to run, can now have the machine, OS and Applications they want while being able to run the software they need.
3) Users who want cool Apple hardware with no intention of ever running OS X will have a Zero cost option to learn about OS X.
Bottom line, Apple will sell more computers. With increased volume comes reduced costs so Apple's prices can be even more competitive. Also, with increased volume, comes increased revenue, which translates to increased R&D which translates to a better OS X. Finally increased market share will increase mind-share and visibility which will increase development for the platform.
This is a good thing.
Prediction:
End of 2008: Mac OS X market share 10%, Apple marketshare 13%.
Don't forget the IT department checklist. Having the possibility to run Windows will make it far easier for companies to slip Mac systems past purchasing.
Way back when, I used to do huge Mac business with AT&T. They were buying a PC coprocessor card (remember them?) with each one. One I visited the plant, and found a very large cabinet stuffed with unopened PC cards.
When I asked, I was told they never had any intention of actually USING the cards; they were just so they could tell the IT guys they were purchasing "Windows compatible" computers.
Way back when, I used to do huge Mac business with AT&T. They were buying a PC coprocessor card (remember them?) with each one. One I visited the plant, and found a very large cabinet stuffed with unopened PC cards.
When I asked, I was told they never had any intention of actually USING the cards; they were just so they could tell the IT guys they were purchasing "Windows compatible" computers.
My boss desperately wants to use the iLife suite at home, but he's an IT manager and just can't bring himself to buy a Mac. Strange thing - he put his order in for a MacMini Duo yesterday afternoon...
Well, I have to say, I think people are missing the big picture here. All is not as it seems.
Think about it.
Everybody is thinking that this piece of "beta" software is it, the end of the road, the final product, when in fact it could very well be what it is, just a beta product to have the public at large test out, and get feedback for fine tuning by Apple.
Then, 4 to 6 months from now, or whenever Leopard ships, "Bootcamp" or wahtever they are going to call it is simply a way to install XP on yur hardware, but they use a piece of virtualization software to let you run XP in a window, or even use it as windows in an evironment like fast user switching.
Imagine this for a second. XP is installed on your machine, you are running 10.5, then you fast user swicth over to windoze...Viola!
OR
Thye create their own virtualization software similar to this Parallel software program at
http://www.parallels.com/en/products/workstation/mac/
Once they work out the kinks on what people are using, get the drivers worked out for the built in iSight and other stuff, it will be ready to go.
MORE people will buy Macs AND end up using OSX for most tasks and using windows for 1 or 2 specialized apps.
Also take a look here
http://macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/9133/
Things start to make more sense after you read the feature list for OS X v10.5 Leopard and how Bootcamp gets the ball rolling.
Now, does that make sense?
Think about it.
Everybody is thinking that this piece of "beta" software is it, the end of the road, the final product, when in fact it could very well be what it is, just a beta product to have the public at large test out, and get feedback for fine tuning by Apple.
Then, 4 to 6 months from now, or whenever Leopard ships, "Bootcamp" or wahtever they are going to call it is simply a way to install XP on yur hardware, but they use a piece of virtualization software to let you run XP in a window, or even use it as windows in an evironment like fast user switching.
Imagine this for a second. XP is installed on your machine, you are running 10.5, then you fast user swicth over to windoze...Viola!
OR
Thye create their own virtualization software similar to this Parallel software program at
http://www.parallels.com/en/products/workstation/mac/
Once they work out the kinks on what people are using, get the drivers worked out for the built in iSight and other stuff, it will be ready to go.
MORE people will buy Macs AND end up using OSX for most tasks and using windows for 1 or 2 specialized apps.
Also take a look here
http://macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/9133/
Things start to make more sense after you read the feature list for OS X v10.5 Leopard and how Bootcamp gets the ball rolling.
Now, does that make sense?
Quoting Anonymous:
>They create their own virtualization software similar
> to this Parallel software program at
>
>http://www.parallels.com/en/products/workstation/
>mac/
Isn't Apple's Virtualisation program called Chameleon?
>They create their own virtualization software similar
> to this Parallel software program at
>
>http://www.parallels.com/en/products/workstation/
>mac/
Isn't Apple's Virtualisation program called Chameleon?
It sure is called Chameleon, and when released with Leopard it will work "in a window" Leopard Server OS may have a netboot Windows" solution.
This is the KILLER app we've been waiting for :-)
This is the KILLER app we've been waiting for :-)
A friend of mine and Mac ideologue made me read your column and I think you're insane. Personally, I recently "switched" to the Mac platform, but I consider myself a user of all systems. I switched to OS X because I thought it would give me the commercial support of Windows and all of the benefits of Linux. Boy was I wrong! It's more like a compromise between the two and it's a huge bummer that Darwin isn't based on the GNU toolchain. Personally, I think OS X is mediocre at best, which is why I am switching to Linux on the G5. I look forward to buying a new MacBook Pro and triple booting Windows, Linux, and Mac OS. So take that and stick it up your ass!
annonymous (last poster) strikes me as someone who has some intellectual investment in windows and linux and is frustrated by having to learn some new key commands.
I rest secure in the knowledge that OS X will gather converts, stability, features, and this users admiration as time goes on.
I rest secure in the knowledge that OS X will gather converts, stability, features, and this users admiration as time goes on.
Personally, I feel that this is a bad move. Apple could have partnered with the likes of Dell, Gateway, etc. and really gained market share while sticking it to the real evil in computing... Microsoft. Apple fans will still buy Apple computers, no matter what. But if Dell was to offer OS X on that new up-scale PC (no $395 computers in this deal), the consumer would win, Apple would win and it would be Microsoft left holding the soggy bag this time.
I feal that a Apple-designed emulation layer would take care of the needs of those with their Windows requiring software. And again, Microsoft would be cut out of the picture.
My main concern would be when the virus writers come up with the malware to let Windows see the Mac partitions... then it will be able to not only screw up Windows, but the Mac as well. This will be easily done.
I'll stick with my Macs without any MS crap on board.
I feal that a Apple-designed emulation layer would take care of the needs of those with their Windows requiring software. And again, Microsoft would be cut out of the picture.
My main concern would be when the virus writers come up with the malware to let Windows see the Mac partitions... then it will be able to not only screw up Windows, but the Mac as well. This will be easily done.
I'll stick with my Macs without any MS crap on board.
I'm not sure I agree that people who insist on using Windows 100% of the time will be switching to Macs at all because of the price difference. These people are going to go for the "cheapest box" they can get and it won't be Apple.
It would be senseless for someone to shell out top dollar for a Mac only to slap Windows on it and use it strictly as a Windows machine when the can go to Dell and get a bargain basement machine.
Otherwise, good article.
Post a Comment
It would be senseless for someone to shell out top dollar for a Mac only to slap Windows on it and use it strictly as a Windows machine when the can go to Dell and get a bargain basement machine.
Otherwise, good article.

