Tuesday, July 01, 2003
Rob Pegoraro's Safari 1.0 review in the Washington Post
The Washington Post's Rob Pegoraro writes a review of Safari 1.0 that echoes many of the sentiments I posted last night. Actually, looking at our posting dates, it appears as if my sentiments were actually echoing his. It's definitely worth reading, and more or less saves me from needing to write a full review of Safari 1.0 myself. It's ironic how Pegoraro and I both recognized the irony of how Apple is fulfulling Microsoft's claim that an embedded browser could be beneficial for an operating system. He points out, though, that unlike with Windows and IE, separating Safari from OS X is as simple as dragging Safari to the trash -- not that any Mac user in their right mind would ever want to. Check out the review.
The Washington Post's Rob Pegoraro writes a review of Safari 1.0 that echoes many of the sentiments I posted last night. Actually, looking at our posting dates, it appears as if my sentiments were actually echoing his. It's definitely worth reading, and more or less saves me from needing to write a full review of Safari 1.0 myself. It's ironic how Pegoraro and I both recognized the irony of how Apple is fulfulling Microsoft's claim that an embedded browser could be beneficial for an operating system. He points out, though, that unlike with Windows and IE, separating Safari from OS X is as simple as dragging Safari to the trash -- not that any Mac user in their right mind would ever want to. Check out the review.
Comments:
Post a Comment
